Printed fromChabadBasel.com
ב"ה

Rabbi's weekly Blog

Be the ‘King in the Field’

About a month ago, I wrote a post about the relationship between parents and their teenage children. The post was directed mainly toward the Chabad community, and its purpose was to encourage us as parents to welcome our children who come home for vacation more as parents and less as educators. It mentioned the difficulty we parents often face in accepting our teenagers as they are, and I suggested trying to be prepared in a way that would reduce conflicts and tense atmosphere at home whenever the son or daughter doesn’t get up on time, doesn’t help, or both.

I received many responses. Some I agreed with more, others less. Many responses I didn’t see at all, only heard that there was some debate about the subject in various WhatsApp groups.

One response, sent to me as a voice message by my dear friend Rabbi Levi Volvovski from Florence, captured my heart and greatly appealed to me.
But wait—a clarification: Levi tends to be precise with his words. I took his words and internalized them, and it’s very possible I am not fully accurate in reflecting his exact intent. I don’t want to put words in his mouth. So what I am writing here are my words, not his. Still, the direction certainly came from him.

Levi brilliantly said: “Be the ‘King in the Field’ for your children.”
The Alter Rebbe compared our relationship with G-d in the month of Elul to that of a king and his subjects when the king goes out to meet them in the field: “Before the king enters the city, the townspeople go out to greet him and welcome him in the field. There, anyone who wishes may approach him, and he receives them all with a pleasant countenance and shows a smiling face to everyone.”

In other words, during Elul it is not only that we make the effort to seek out G-d, but He—indeed, primarily He—goes beyond His usual manner and visits us where we are, as we are, and He welcomes us all with a pleasant countenance and shows us a smiling face.

Now, imagine—said Levi—that in the month of Av (and of course not only then), when our children come home for vacation, we would be their “King in the Field”. That we would meet them in the place that interests them, accept them as they are, and greet them with a truly pleasant countenance. And with G-d, there is no pretense and no performance: His “pleasant countenance” is not the smile of an American waitress, and His “smiling face” is not the business-class flight attendant’s grin. With G-d, a pleasant countenance and a smiling face express inner truth.

And since this is a matter of truth, it is by no means an easy task. But our Sages have already taught—and the Rambam codifies it in Hilchot De’ot: “We are commanded to follow these middle paths, which are the good and upright ways, as it says: ‘You shall walk in His ways.’ And this is how they explained this commandment: Just as He is called gracious, so should you be gracious. Just as He is called compassionate, so should you be compassionate.” If He knows how to go out and be the King in the Field, then you too should be the King in the Field: to truly accept, with a truly pleasant countenance, and to truly show a smiling face.

May we succeed,
Shabbat Shalom,
Rabbi Zalman Wishedski

Be who you are

A story I really love tells of a man who would sit every evening in a bar, drink beer but never to the end. The last bit of the beer, he would spray on the people around him. Naturally, this irritated the public, and the bartender wasn’t thrilled either.

One evening, the bartender turned to him and said: “Why don’t you go for some kind of emotional or psychological therapy to deal with this? It’s not acceptable that you come here every night and spray beer on the customers.” The bartender even offered to pay for five sessions with a professional.


A month and a half passed, and the man showed up again at the bar.

“I’m a new man,” he said. “The therapy was wonderful.”

“In that case, the first beer is on me,” said the bartender, proud of their shared success.


Fifteen minutes later, to the bartender’s shock, the man sprayed the remainder of his beer on the customers.

Angry, upset, and disappointed, the bartender asked: “Didn’t you say you had therapy and became a new man?”

“Indeed I did, and absolutely so,” replied the beer-sprayer.

“So what did the psychologist tell you there?” asked the bartender.

“Well,” said the man, “she told me something wonderful that no one had ever said to me before. She told me: ‘Be who you are, and be proud of it!’ And as you can see, I am who I am - I spray beer on people — and I’m proud of it.”



The sharp-eyed among my followers have noticed that this week my family and I spent time in the Swiss mountains, as is customary here. We walked a lot in nature, took a cable car up to about 2,100 meters above sea level, and walked back down on foot to our lodging, which lies some 700 meters below that, at around 1,400 meters above sea level. The descent is long and winding, but slow and pleasant. The family walks together, talks, sings, meditates, laughs, gets annoyed when necessary, and of course pauses to eat sliced fruit. For a long time now, I no longer call this a “family trip” but rather “family therapy.”


Yesterday we walked along a mountainside completely covered in trees, a real forest. For part of the time, I walked ahead alone, marveling at the wondrous creation of Hashem, thinking of the Baal Shem Tov, who began his path in a forest. I looked at the trees and suddenly noticed something interesting: the trees growing on the slope of the mountain, even on a steep incline, all have their tops pointing upward toward the heavens. They don’t grow straight relative to the ground in which they’re rooted, but instead bend and curve upward.

As the trunk emerges from the earth, it immediately curves and straightens itself so that the tree will grow upright.


There is, of course, no person there to direct the trees to grow correctly. No gardener to educate or force them upward. So how is this?

I read briefly that there are several reasons, for example, that the tree seeks its source of light, the sun, and so it directs itself upward. In short: the tree by its very nature, if undisturbed, will grow correctly and orient itself upward.


When the tree remembers to “be who you are,” it grows well and right. But what about me?


I thought about myself. I don’t always grow when oriented upward. If there weren’t a gardener to straighten me, who knows what would happen? And without parents and teachers, isn’t there a risk that my direction wouldn’t be heavenward at all? But why? Why is it that if a person decides simply to “be who you are,” there’s a danger he might grow the opposite way? Isn’t it said that “man is like the tree of the field”?


Perhaps I’m mistaken, but the central difference, in my opinion, is this: a tree has no evil inclination. A tree has no inner force that challenges it. A tree has no temptations full of emotion and reason pulling it one way or another. I do.

Before a person decides to “be who you are,” he must first clarify well: who is this “you”? Is it his divine soul, or his animal soul? Does “I am who I am” mean that I run from thrill to thrill, or that I build endurance in the face of thrills and succeed in pausing before acting? Am I “who I am” when I keep sleeping even though I have obligations, or am I “who I am” precisely when I overcome and rise to meet those obligations?


I agree with the psychologist who told that man, “Be who you are and be proud of it” but only after one has gone through the clarification and refinement. When you know how to connect to your higher self, to the *mensch* within you, then go ahead and be who you are.


Shabbat Shalom,

Rabbi Zalman Wishedski


Regards from your sister Judy

 

Shortly after our arrival in Basel, nearly a quarter of a century ago, I received a phone call from a woman named Judy, from Sydney, Australia. She was calling because her sister, Rachel, had once been in some children’s home in Basel — and had since passed away. From what I understood, her sister had not been well. Judy didn’t really know her; Rachel was only 14 when she left this world, and she had been much younger when their parents decided — for her own good — to send her from Sydney to live in a special children’s home in Switzerland.

Rachel passed away in the early 1980s. Judy, who called me in the early years of the current millennium, simply asked me to go and look for Rachel’s grave, to say some Mishnayot there, and perhaps even light a candle.

I have the date of Rachel’s yahrzeit written down in my calendar — and, truthfully, in my heart as well — and I make an effort to visit her grave each year on that date. I also sometimes stop by when I am at the cemetery for a funeral, reciting a chapter of Psalms and placing a stone there. “Regards from your sister Judy,” I whisper to her.

It moves me deeply, I admit. I don’t exactly know why — perhaps because it’s such a small act. Perhaps because I have the privilege of being the link between the two sisters. Last week, I passed by and stopped to place a stone and recite a short Shir HaMa’alot. A friend asked me, “Who is this Rachel?” I said, “Never mind, it’s a long story.” And in my heart I thought about the spiritual bond I was creating in that moment between Judy in Sydney and Rachel in Basel — without the conscious mind knowing consciously, without my being able to say exactly what was connected to what and how — but it moved me, and that was enough.

I am writing these words as I sit on the train from Frankfurt to Basel, having landed two hours ago from Almaty, Kazakhstan, where I spent about 19 hours visiting the grave of Rabbi Levi Yitzchak Schneerson, of blessed memory — the Rebbe’s father. Together with me were hundreds of other Chabad chassidim. I do not know what motivated each of them, though I can guess.

I know what motivated me, and it is very similar to my visit to Rachel’s grave on behalf of her sister.

My Rebbe, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, never had the privilege of visiting his father’s grave. The son left Russia before the war, while the father still served with dignity and pride as the chief rabbi of Yekaterinoslav — a city that later reverted to the name Dnepropetrovsk, and more recently was shortened to Dnipro (thank you to Ukraine’s Naming Committee for the abbreviation). The son was already by the side of his father-in-law, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn, while his own father was waging the battle for Judaism in Soviet Russia — a battle that ended in arrest, imprisonment, exile to Kazakhstan, and passing away on the 20th of Menachem Av, 1944, in Almaty.

The exile did not end with his life; even his passing and burial were in exile. At that time there was no Jewish cemetery there — or at least not one in use — and he was buried where it was possible. It is not an easy sight to take in.

My Rebbe, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, was never there and never merited the basic human longing to stand at his father’s grave — to recite a chapter of Psalms, Mishnayot for his soul, Kaddish, and light a candle. And when I stood there alone yesterday at dawn, at Rabbi Levi Yitzchak’s gravesite, I quietly hummed his melody and asked in my heart to merit being there also on behalf of the son — to take part in honoring the Rebbe’s father.

I do not know if I am worthy of that. I do not understand these matters. I simply came as I am — a chassid who loves his Rebbe and wants to honor him. Without the conscious mind knowing consciously, without my being able to say exactly what was connected to what and how — but it moved me, and that was enough.

Shabbat Shalom,
Rabbi Zalman Wishedski




as we left the Hakafot

About eighteen years ago, Mendel Ostro, of blessed memory, spent Simchat Torah with me.

Mendel Ostro was a chassid of the Rebbe of Ostrowiec. He grew up in the town of Szydlowiec in Poland and, at a young age, survived the Holocaust alone. We had met many times before, but that holiday he actually stayed in our home. He was our guest for two full and wonderful days.


Mendel spoke only briefly about his personal suffering in the Holocaust. Mostly, he spoke with heartfelt yearning about his Rebbe, Rabbi Yechezkel of Ostrowiec, הי״ד. His longing for his Rebbe was alive and palpable, and he would often recount how the Rebbe had asked him to put on tefillin and keep Shabbat even when it was difficult. Mendel would quietly add, “I do it because I promised the Rebbe.”


He told many stories about his town of Szydlowiec and also about its terrible destruction when the Germans came. That Simchat Torah, we walked slowly together to pray at the Agudas Achim synagogue, as he described the Simchat Torah celebrations in Szydlowiec before the war.


In the middle of the hakafot dancing, Mendel suddenly grabbed my hand and said, “Nem mir a heim – Take me home. I can’t stay here. I can’t bear to see Jews so joyful. In Szydlowiec, Simchat Torah was celebrated the right way. Now it’s no longer permitted to rejoice like that.”


I said nothing. I didn’t try to argue. I just looked into his eyes and stayed silent. I saw that he wasn’t seeing me or the dancing crowd. He was seeing Szydlowiec. He was looking at his Rebbe. Mendel placed his arm in mine, and we quietly walked back home.


---


There is a story in the Haggadah about Rabbi Eliezer, Rabbi Yehoshua, Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah, Rabbi Akiva, and Rabbi Tarfon, who were reclining together in Bnei Brak. But why Bnei Brak?

Four of the five sages did not live in Bnei Brak. Why then did they all come there to celebrate the Seder night?

My favorite interpretation explains that those were days of recent and searing destruction. Some of them even personally remembered the Beit HaMikdash. Rabbi Yehoshua had the privilege of playing the Levi’s musical instruments in the Temple. Rabbi Tarfon testified that he had heard the Kohen Gadol pronounce the Ineffable Name on Yom Kippur. Rabbi Eliezer was among those who smuggled Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai out to Yavne before the destruction.

For them, it was all still fresh — like Szydlowiec for Mendel Ostro. The destruction was real and tangible. To sit at a Seder table, an evening so deeply connected to the memory of the Temple, was a deeply painful experience — perhaps like Simchat Torah was for my friend Mendel.


So they came to Rabbi Akiva because they were searching for hope, for optimism, for a positive outlook. They came to the incurable optimist — not only someone who could rise from the rubble, but who could see the building within the ruins.

When 24,000 of his students died in a short time and "the world was desolate," it was Rabbi Akiva who gathered five remaining students — and from them, Torah flourished.

They remembered how, when they walked with him and heard the sounds of Roman dominance and wept, he laughed — because he saw in his mind’s eye the sounds of Jerusalem that would surely come.

When they saw the Temple Mount destroyed and foxes walking through it and they cried, “Rabbi Akiva was laughing,” because he saw in the depth of the destruction the depth of the rebuilding, in the depth of exile the depth of redemption.

And they themselves acknowledged him and said, “Akiva, you have comforted us. Akiva, you have comforted us.”


So they came to Rabbi Akiva in Bnei Brak because there, with him, they could find the strength to truly celebrate the Seder night. With him, as they placed the ׳zeroa׳ on the Seder plate — a symbol of the Temple that had just been destroyed — they would surely cry, but then look at Rabbi Akiva, who saw the future, and they too would be able to laugh.


This Shabbat is Shabbat Nachamu.

"Nachamu, nachamu ami" – Comfort, comfort My people, the prophet will tell us tomorrow. It’s not always easy. Perhaps it never is. But it is certainly possible — to look into exile and destruction and see redemption and rebuilding.


Shabbat Shalom,

Rabbi Zalman Wishedski

Go towards the lands of the Amorites

Enough of sitting here near Mount Sinai – get up and go towards the lands of the Amorites, the Ammonites and Moabites. That’s what Moshe Rabbeinu said to the Jewish People at the beginning of parashat Devarim, thousands of years ago: “Enough of your dwelling by this mountain. Turn yourselves around and journey, and come to the Amorite mountain and all its neighbors.” Leave the pure and holy place where you are now living; get up and come to a place that is considered to be distant, alien and even against Torah and mitzvot.


So said the Lubavitcher Rebbe to his chassidim over sixty years ago.

In a wonderful letter to the directors of the younger faction of Chabad, dated Rosh Chodesh Shevat, 5718 (1958) the Rebbe encouraged them, based on the above-mentioned passuk from Devarim, not to remain at home but to go out and be active; not to stand, but to walk. In today’s language we would say, “Step out of your comfort zone and go seek challenges.”


As usual, the Rebbe says it better than me, and therefore I will quote: “’Enough of your dwelling by this mountain,’ even though this is the place where the Torah was given, because a person should go from strength to strength, and also – not be satisfied with his actions and self-decoration, but also influence others, including the others who are outside. Therefore, ‘Turn yourselves… and journey’ – but the journey in itself and passing through a place is not enough, rather ‘come’ – in pnimiyut.”


But wait a minute, the Amorites and their neighbors symbolize the opposite of kedushah, holiness. They symbolize a place where there is distance from, alienation and even resistance to Torah, kedushah and anything holy. But is there a place in the world that we can define as such, like the Amorites and their neighbors? One who is familiar with the Rebbe’s Torah knows already that by him there was no place that was distant, no place that was alien, because the world belongs to Hashem. Moreover, the Shluchim of the Rebbe in the world know that every place they arrived in and was considered cold and alienated, pretty soon showed itself to contain kedushah and the warmth of Torah and mitzvot despite what it looked like to anyone who lived in what is generally called a “city of Torah” and the like. Therefore, one should pay attention to the wonderful careful reading of the Rebbe’s words, when he is defining a place that is like the Mountain of the Amorites: a place where in face of the nation, all of whom are tzaddikim, it seems to them “the Amorite mountain and all its neighbors.”


It is clear from the letter that he doesn’t want all its readers to get up physically and change their geographic location. It is also clear that the Rebbe is asking every one of his readers to move a bit, to advance, to walk, to be a walker, to leave the place he is used to, his comfort zone, and move along.


The letter opens with praise to the addressees for the many activities they are already engaged in, but as usual, the Rebbe immediately warns them that the place they have arrived at and that has become a spiritual comfort zone, like Mount Sinai was for those who left Egypt, is a place where one can stagnate, and therefore he immediately mentions the passuk: “Enough of your dwelling by this mountain. Turn yourselves around and journey…” Move on, don’t stay in place.


The Rebbe concludes with the rest of the passuk, wishing them well but also guiding them to a destiny: And by doing so they will fulfill the destiny of “When Hashem your G-d will broaden your boundary until the great river, the River of Prat (Euphrates).” In other words, the goal they should aim for is the complete and true Redemption.


Shabbat Shalom,

Rabbi Zalman Wishedski

Looking for older posts? See the sidebar for the Archive.