Printed fromChabadBasel.com
ב"ה

Rabbi's weekly Blog

My relationship with the concept of Kabbalat Ol

My relationship with the concept of *“accepting the yoke”* (“Kabbalat Ol”) is as long as my life itself. It has been complex and complicated, responsible for quite a few frustrations and challenges that I experienced throughout most of my life. And when the Torah portion of Bechukotai arrives — a portion that suddenly defines all the commandments of the Torah with one single word: *“statutes”* — this feels like the right time to look at it honestly and courageously, and truthfully also to admit that something has changed. Something good is happening.


The foundation of Jewish life is built upon *Kabbalat Ol*, upon *“Na’aseh VeNishma”* — “We will do and we will hear.”


This week, an educated Christian man visited me and asked to discuss several topics. The first was kashrut, and he presented various rational arguments against refraining from eating pork. My answer was simple: I do not eat or avoid something because I understand the reason for it. God did not give us reasons; He simply told us what we may and may not eat. The explanations and rationalizations are human intellect — we avoid non-kosher food because of Divine wisdom.


I watched his reaction, and honestly, I was genuinely surprised. He was positively shocked. He said he had not expected such an answer: “I came to speak with you on level one, and you’re speaking to me on level one hundred.” He put aside the rest of the questions he had brought with him, and the conversation moved elsewhere — if I may use his wording, the discussion became “level one hundred.”


But that is the easy part of *Kabbalat Ol*.


The difficult part is doing things that are genuinely hard for you — things that require enormous effort and painful inner struggle. Like getting up every single morning at the time you are supposed to get up, even though you were not the one who chose that hour; the *Shulchan Aruch* chose it for you hundreds of years ago without consulting you. Finishing the daily study sessions you are expected to complete even when you are tired and exhausted, even though you did not choose those lessons; your Rebbe chose them for you.


Doing things that go against your familiar nature simply because you must. Saying “yes” to someone joyfully when what you really want is to say a very big “no.” And vice versa — saying “no” when it feels deeply uncomfortable and you desperately want to say “yes.” Asking someone for help or a favor when emotionally and mentally you feel incapable of doing so. Dealing with things that stress you to the point of losing your breath because they simply must be dealt with. Holding yourself back from hurting or insulting someone even when you yourself were deeply hurt. Accepting the ruling of your rabbinic authority even when you were truly hoping he would somehow “arrange” a leniency for you.


I once wrote an essay about “the person of Tohu” versus “the person of Tikun.” There are certainly people who came into this world with built-in self-discipline, and for them it is easier to cope with life. Opposite them stand the “people of chaos,” who came into the world with tremendous inner disorder in both mind and heart — and for them it is a little (or a lot) harder to cope with life.


But even if we put that distinction aside for a moment and include everyone together, coping with *Kabbalat Ol* is not simple at all.


Over the years, I discovered that my central difficulty came from believing there was no room whatsoever to listen to the heart. No room for desire, longing, passion, dreams, or aspirations. There was only *Na’aseh VeNishma*, only *Kabbalat Ol*, only “the mind ruling the heart.” No “want,” only “must.” And of course the famous Chassidic expression: *“Azoi un nisht andersh”* — “This way and no other.”


Slowly, with a great deal of audacity and fear — almost as if I were bordering on heresy against everything I had been taught — I realized that this approach was not entirely accurate. Not only for me, but for human beings in general, it is simply not suitable. So I found for myself a slightly broader approach, one that allows me to truly accept *Kabbalat Ol*.


Here is the approach:


Imagine you are sitting around a round table in a meeting held to make a decision about something important. Until now, only the head, the logic, the intellect — essentially the “must” — were invited to the table. From now on, bring the heart to the table as well: the passion, the joy, the attraction, the longing — essentially the “want.”


When the meeting begins, allow everyone equal space to speak: both the heart and the mind; both sound logic and emotional desire; both what I must do and what I genuinely want to do.


Truly listen to the heart — to the desire, the passion, the attraction, the “I feel like it,” and everything that arises. Then listen to the mind, to healthy reasoning, to what is necessary and required.


In the end, the decision should still be made through intellect and reason, because that is what distinguishes human beings from animals. But when the intellectual decision comes only after giving space to the heart as well, it will probably be gentler, more fitting, and much easier to accept.


The mind absolutely should rule the heart — but the heart most certainly deserves a seat at the table and the opportunity to express itself.


Try this at home. There is a good chance you will be pleasantly surprised.


Shabbat Shalom,

Rabbi Zalman Wishedski

Step out of the boxing ring

“Nitah kein farfallen” (“nothing is lost”) is sometimes understood as referring to a situation that is almost lost — almost everything is over, almost gone — and then comes Pesach Sheni, stands firmly on its feet, and declares: *nothing is lost*.

A couple serving as shluchim who came to me for marriage counseling over Zoom have made — and are continuing to make — a wonderful and moving journey. But at the beginning, when they first came and everything looked like one big chaos, he presented a picture of a relationship that seemed almost beyond repair, and she agreed to come only to give it one last chance. I stopped them and asked them to step for a moment outside the “courtroom,” to temporarily set aside all the incriminating evidence they were holding, and to draw the picture of their optimal, ultimate, desired, dream relationship.


It was really difficult. They were deep in the mud. Both had come wearing boxing gloves, already standing on opposite sides of the ring, ready for the countdown — and suddenly they were asked to stop everything and begin thinking about something far, far away: an optimal state.


He managed to go along with it first. He thought for a moment and said:

“For me, an optimal relationship would be that we don’t fight, that we stop getting angry. That we won’t be sour all the time. That whenever we’re home together there won’t be something heavy between us. No fights, no anger.”

He kept describing this until I stopped him and said:

“Look how even your dream is still very far from something truly bright. If the maximum you can imagine is no fighting, no anger, no heaviness 


you’re describing a ceasefire agreement. But not peace.


And if peace — then at most like the peace between Israel and Egypt. No visits, Israelis don’t vacation in Cairo and Egyptians don’t visit Tel Aviv. Yes, we try not to kill each other.


Is that your maximum?


Is this your ‚nitah kein farfallen‘? That nothing is lost, and therefore maybe we’ll still manage to live without anger, fights, shouting, and bitterness?!


Try to imagine peace like the peace with the United Arab Emirates — full flights back and forth with tourists, flourishing businesses, everyone celebrating. Do you have the courage and ability to dream about something like that between you?”


“I need a few shots of l’chaim to imagine that,” he told me with a painful smile.


We were silent for a few minutes. Then he spoke — actually, they both spoke — because they had both calmed down a little and completed each other’s thoughts:


“Optimally: that we will want to be together. That we will feel most at home with each other. That there will be joy and love and friendship. That every meeting, whether morning or evening, will bring a smile and happiness. That every message between us will spark something — maybe even longing, even excitement. That the home will be warm and joyful.”


And they continued, painting for themselves the destination they were aiming toward.


By the way — they are on their way there.


Because ‚nitah kein farfallen‘ doesn’t speak only about the chance that we won’t collapse or fall apart. “Nothing is lost” should apply especially when we are living in mediocrity and refuse to accept it — when we continue striving for excellence because nothing is lost.


If you are living in a situation that is merely “okay” in any area of life and you accept it because “this won’t change in this lifetime” — this is the moment to stop and say:

Today is ‚Pesach Sheni‘. Nothing is lost. There is no such thing as a life in which there is no longer a chance for things to become enjoyable, amazing, pleasant, excellent — with financial wellbeing and emotional and spiritual wellbeing.


Nothing is lost.


And therefore this is the time to pause for a moment in the race of life, look toward the horizon, and try to imagine how our lives could be much better — our parenting, our marriage, our material life, and our spiritual life.


Because ‚nitah kein farfallen‘.


Shabbat Shalom,

Rabbi Zalman Wishedski 

Looking for older posts? See the sidebar for the Archive.